1792 Militia Act

Militia Act of 1792,
Second Congress, Session I. Chapter XXVIII
Passed May 2, 1792,
providing for the authority of the President to call out the Militia

Sec. 2.

And be it further enacted, That whenever the laws of the United States shall be opposed or the execution thereof obstructed, in any state, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals by this act, the same being notified to the President of the United States, by an associate justice or the district judge, it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to call forth the militia of such state to suppress such combinations, and to cause the laws to be duly executed. And if the militia of a state, where such combinations may happen, shall refuse, or be insufficient to suppress the same, it shall be lawful for the President, if the legislature of the United States be not in session, to call forth and employ such numbers of the militia of any other state or states most convenient thereto, as may be necessary, and the use of militia, so to be called forth, may be continued, if necessary, until the expiration of thirty days after the commencement of the ensuing session.

My Comments:

That is section 2 of the 1792 militia act. It clearly states: “That whenever the laws of the United States shall be opposed or the execution thereof obstructed, in any state,  by combinations to powerful to be supressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, it shall be lawful for the president to call forth the militia to suppress such combinations…” Now in the next sentence it says “And if the militia of a state, shall refuse, or be insufficient to supress the same, it shall be lawful for the president, IF THE LEGISLATOR OF THE UNITED STATES BE NOT IN SESSION, to call forth etc…” Now, since the legislation exists for ordinary armed citizens to oppose combinations to powerful for the judiciary, what do we do about such a combination taking complete control of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the entire government, not to mention also taking control of the Monetary, Economic, Banking, Media, Education and almost every other institution in the country? What is this combination which has become so all powerful? International Finance Capital. We find at every investigation into every problem the same Special Interest/Banking/Corporate combinations of International Finance and pro israeli/jewish lobbies. Since they have overpowered all of our supposedly elected politicians through corruption and bribery, therefore ensuring their continued prosperity at the expense of all of ours, how are we going to stop them in a peaceful manner? It becomes glaringly obvious that the reason for the 1792 militia act was to ensure that no such monopoly was to be tolerated by the citizens, and if it comes into existence it is to be rooted out entirely. After all, America was founded on violence and runs on violence, just look at what atrocities are commited around the world in the name of the United States, perhaps we should ask them to stop, nicely… Im sure they are reasonable people right? You know, the people who run Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay… I know, I’ll bet we can take them to court, the ones that have ruled everything constitutional for almost 100 years, they will save us right? Ok well we have a redress of grievances, we can just tell the government to be nice to us… If you call your congressman he will immediately take care of it, except that he is also under the control of the source of the problems, International Finance Capital and the lobbyists/campaign contributors.

Well I have some news for you, you will receive nothing that you do not take by your own will and determination. I trust the last 20 years alone, which witnessed events like the Randy Weaver family slaughter in Ruby Ridge Idaho, has shown us that we are dealing with a perverted system, not the one you are taught about in the government brainwashing facility also known as the school system, be it public or private. At Ruby Ridge 14 year old Samuel Weaver was shot in the back and killed by Federal Agents. Next Vicki Weaver was shot in the head and killed while holding a young infant. We have went from the isolated murder of those viewed as threats to the partnership of corruption to the current practice of appointing a guy like Keith Alexander to the head of the National Security Agency. Keith Alexander, promoted to a four star general after his great example of humanitarian principles displayed at Abu Ghraib, is a disgusting figure who should make us realize that national security means torture of innocent civilians. Keith Alexander being appointed to its head should make us realize that the civilians in need of torture are American…

JB Campbell has an excellent comment to Larken Rose in the postscript at the end of the following article

http://www.jbcampbellextremismonline.com/5/post/2013/07/g-2.html

The 1792 militia act was, in my opinion, to ensure the success of “the last option.”

“When peaceful revolution is made impossible, violent revolution becomes inevitable.”

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

So why didn’t our great and grand constitution have some sort of provision to garauntee us freedom from corrupted institutions or at least a clause on what to do in such a situation?

Obviously because they didn’t want us to realize even than that we did not need an overbearing federal government, that we can do all this ourselves… We had the great example of Patrick Henry, George Mason and Richard Lee. The anti-federalists. The last thing the federalists wanted to emphasize was the fact that the citizen body should have the same powers to suppress combinations to powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings. What is the reason for putting no power in the hands of the people to protect themselves? The government is a cruel tyrant and would not want to empower the idea of the people taking control or taking action to defend their interests…

What such combinations exist that could be to powerul? Well, the government itself is a combination of finance and special interests so even the traitor government could be called “a combination to powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” The traitor news media is another such combination. Banking, Corporations, Federal Law Enforcement, Hollywood… I mean everything is just one large combination of the anti – citizen agenda so where are the pissed off #$*!? citizens to strike the fear of ?@#$! into all these complete pyscopaths masquerading as government institutions? I would like to add that the judicial and legislative branches along with, of course, the executive branches are also combinations to powerful to be supressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings… Well, NO SHIT!