israeli Institutions Among Us!

untitled (3)

Established in 1929, The jewish Agency for israel has worked to secure a vibrant jewish future. The jewish Agency was instrumental in founding and building the State of israel and we continue to serve as the official link between the jewish state and jewish communities everywhere. This global partnership has enabled us to address the jewish People’s greatest challenges in every generation.

Today, we connect the global jewish family, bringing jews to israel, and israel to jews. We build a better society in israel – and beyond – energizing young israelis and their worldwide peers to rediscover a collective sense of jewish purpose(National Destabilization) The jewish Agency continues to be the jewish world’s first responder, prepared to rescue and bring jews home to israel from countries where they are at-risk.

My comments:

First of all, in response to this ridiculous organization I was curious if “a better society in israel” was also for the Palestinians? Are they allowed to have a better society in this apartheid state? Perhaps one free of white phosphorus attacks? Maybe one where they can keep their homes and their children do not get shot at walking to school? Using white phosphorus is consiered illegal and an International War Crime, by the way.

Do we seriously have to tolerate such institutions among us? Propagandizing our youth? We do not even allow the teaching of the American Government’s direct involvement with israel in the murder of 34 Americans and the wounding of 170 more in OPERATION CYANIDE. the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. An American jewish Operation for israel perpetrated by the alarming number of jews among us. If you are wondering what number is alarming I would say that when jews reach the ability to control our politicians entirely through campaign contributions and AIPAC, that should be considered alarming!

Here I found on an israeli website some very nice people that we can count on to teach our youth about how great israel is. Oy Vey!

PazShahor

Paz Shahor-Goldschmidt is the Community Shlicha at the Milwaukee jewish federation.

Paz was born in tel aviv and now lives in moshav moledet, in northern israel.

paz has a great deal of experience in educational work in many of the leading educational frameworks such as Melitz, israel Experience Inc., “March of the Living” and “Mifgashim” within the Charles Bronfman’s Center. During the last 5 years she has been teaching dance and Yoga in The Democratic School and at Kefar Izun, a unique village for alternative treatment of drug rehabilitation. Paz will serve as the Community Shlicha to the Milwaukee Jewish Federation. She and her family will start their Shlichut on August 2009.

Agassi1

Michal Agasi is the Young Community Shlicha in Madison Wisconsin and the israel fellow at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

She grew up in petach tikva, and served as an Education Officer in the Naval Academy. After the army, she worked at summer camps and became active in the hillel at sapir College where she studied for her BA. While at school she had her own radio show and got her degree in film and media studies. She is also active in the Naval Academy alumni association.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to israeli Institutions Among Us!

  1. the people displayed in this video are some straight up terrorist motherfuckers, terrorizing everyone! israel must be occupied and disarmed 100% new legislation banning jews from possessing so much as a steak knife…

  2. paulvonharnish says:

    Hello: Perhaps you will find this interesting. A very interesting history in-deeds
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates

    • I find it intolerable and the manufacture of firearms to be the only thing stopping a complete jewish takeover. Foreigners attempting to control our institutions while poisoning our youth must be opposed with every breath of our existence!

      • paulvonharnish says:

        Local Nationalism is just the beginning. The world needs a serious divorce from the United Nations and New World Order dictates. These trade orgainizations and quasi political organizations need to be dismantaled through direct seizure and confiscation of their infrastructure. No small feat, what with all the milktoast and zombies out there.

  3. paulvonharnish says:

    The reason I sent the link mainly revolves around persons who have been involved in the firlds of the biosciences and chemistry. The worldwide electrical grid could be thought of as a 10 tara watt microwave oven. It’s not the heat that makes it dangerous, it’s the direct fragmentation of DNA in biological cells, and the destuction of autoimmune funtions. It’s no joke, and very real. Thank you for your interest.

    • Yes they have all kinds of technology but we are Europeans, we were and can be again the masters of the only language jews understand – violence – this is our duty here, to spread the idea of radical nationalism against jewish rule! resistance is obligatory!

  4. Paul, sorry Ive been working a lot… yes I agree with you, however, upon really looking into it, we are our biggest problem, its very sad but we as a people have become so effeminate and pathetic… you should really think about what my friend J Bruce Campbell says, it sounds extreme at first but it actually isn’t, what we are tolerating is what’s extreme, thee people we are dealing with are just gangster’s using the threat of violence against us, they are in power because we are weak, as soon as we get with the resistance program they are done, that day, that’s how weak we have collectively become… it angers me to no end… have you ever red any Charles Lindbergh, the old man? He was a fucking genius!

    • paulvonharnish says:

      Hello Mike: I hadn’t looked into Charles Lindbergh for some time. Maybe your readers will benefit from this speech made in 1941. Note the usual protagonists. >

      Charles Lindbergh
      Des Moines Speech

      “It is now two years since this latest European war began. From that day in September, 1939, until the present moment, there has been an over-increasing effort to force the United States into the conflict.

      That effort has been carried on by foreign interests, and by a small minority of our own people; but it has been so successful that, today, our country stands on the verge of war.

      At this time, as the war is about to enter its third winter, it seems appropriate to review the circumstances that have led us to our present position. Why are we on the verge of war? Was it necessary for us to become so deeply involved? Who is responsible for changing our national policy from one of neutrality and independence to one of entanglement in European affairs?

      Personally, I believe there is no better argument against our intervention than a study of the causes and developments of the present war. I have often said that if the true facts and issues were placed before the American people, there would be no danger of our involvement.

      Here, I would like to point out to you a fundamental difference between the groups who advocate foreign war, and those who believe in an independent destiny for America.

      If you will look back over the record, you will find that those of us who oppose intervention have constantly tried to clarify facts and issues; while the interventionists have tried to hide facts and confuse issues.

      We ask you to read what we said last month, last year, and even before the war began. Our record is open and clear, and we are proud of it.

      We have not led you on by subterfuge and propaganda. We have not resorted to steps short of anything, in order to take the American people where they did not want to go.

      What we said before the elections, we say [illegible] and again, and again today. And we will not tell you tomorrow that it was just campaign oratory. Have you ever heard an interventionist, or a British agent, or a member of the administration in Washington ask you to go back and study a record of what they have said since the war started? Are their self-styled defenders of democracy willing to put the issue of war to a vote of our people? Do you find these crusaders for foreign freedom of speech, or the removal of censorship here in our own country?

      The subterfuge and propaganda that exists in our country is obvious on every side. Tonight, I shall try to pierce through a portion of it, to the naked facts which lie beneath.

      When this war started in Europe, it was clear that the American people were solidly opposed to entering it. Why shouldn’t we be? We had the best defensive position in the world; we had a tradition of independence from Europe; and the one time we did take part in a European war left European problems unsolved, and debts to America unpaid.

      National polls showed that when England and France declared war on Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight, and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must know exactly who they are.

      The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.

      Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of capitalists, Anglophiles, and intellectuals who believe that the future of mankind depends upon the domination of the British empire. Add to these the Communistic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago, and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country.

      I am speaking here only of war agitators, not of those sincere but misguided men and women who, confused by misinformation and frightened by propaganda, follow the lead of the war agitators.

      As I have said, these war agitators comprise only a small minority of our people; but they control a tremendous influence. Against the determination of the American people to stay out of war, they have marshaled the power of their propaganda, their money, their patronage.

      Let us consider these groups, one at a time.

      First, the British: It is obvious and perfectly understandable that Great Britain wants the United States in the war on her side. England is now in a desperate position. Her population is not large enough and her armies are not strong enough to invade the continent of Europe and win the war she declared against Germany.

      Her geographical position is such that she cannot win the war by the use of aviation alone, regardless of how many planes we send her. Even if America entered the war, it is improbable that the Allied armies could invade Europe and overwhelm the Axis powers. But one thing is certain. If England can draw this country into the war, she can shift to our shoulders a large portion of the responsibility for waging it and for paying its cost.

      As you all know, we were left with the debts of the last European war; and unless we are more cautious in the future than we have been in the past, we will be left with the debts of the present case. If it were not for her hope that she can make us responsible for the war financially, as well as militarily, I believe England would have negotiated a peace in Europe many months ago, and be better off for doing so.

      England has devoted, and will continue to devote every effort to get us into the war. We know that she spent huge sums of money in this country during the last war in order to involve us. Englishmen have written books about the cleverness of its use.

      We know that England is spending great sums of money for propaganda in America during the present war. If we were Englishmen, we would do the same. But our interest is first in America; and as Americans, it is essential for us to realize the effort that British interests are making to draw us into their war.

      The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

      It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

      No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

      Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

      Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

      I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

      We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

      The Roosevelt administration is the third powerful group which has been carrying this country toward war. Its members have used the war emergency to obtain a third presidential term for the first time in American history. They have used the war to add unlimited billions to a debt which was already the highest we have ever known. And they have just used the war to justify the restriction of congressional power, and the assumption of dictatorial procedures on the part of the president and his appointees.

      The power of the Roosevelt administration depends upon the maintenance of a wartime emergency. The prestige of the Roosevelt administration depends upon the success of Great Britain to whom the president attached his political future at a time when most people thought that England and France would easily win the war. The danger of the Roosevelt administration lies in its subterfuge. While its members have promised us peace, they have led us to war heedless of the platform upon which they were elected.

      In selecting these three groups as the major agitators for war, I have included only those whose support is essential to the war party. If any one of these groups–the British, the Jewish, or the administration–stops agitating for war, I believe there will be little danger of our involvement.

      I do not believe that any two of them are powerful enough to carry this country to war without the support of the third. And to these three, as I have said, all other war groups are of secondary importance.

      When hostilities commenced in Europe, in 1939, it was realized by these groups that the American people had no intention of entering the war. They knew it would be worse than useless to ask us for a declaration of war at that time. But they believed that this country could be entered into the war in very much the same way we were entered into the last one.

      They planned: first, to prepare the United States for foreign war under the guise of American defense; second, to involve us in the war, step by step, without our realization; third, to create a series of incidents which would force us into the actual conflict. These plans were of course, to be covered and assisted by the full power of their propaganda.

      Our theaters soon became filled with plays portraying the glory of war. Newsreels lost all semblance of objectivity. Newspapers and magazines began to lose advertising if they carried anti-war articles. A smear campaign was instituted against individuals who opposed intervention. The terms “fifth columnist,” “traitor,” “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic” were thrown ceaselessly at any one who dared to suggest that it was not to the best interests of the United States to enter the war. Men lost their jobs if they were frankly anti-war. Many others dared no longer speak.

      Before long, lecture halls that were open to the advocates of war were closed to speakers who opposed it. A fear campaign was inaugurated. We were told that aviation, which has held the British fleet off the continent of Europe, made America more vulnerable than ever before to invasion. Propaganda was in full swing.

      There was no difficulty in obtaining billions of dollars for arms under the guise of defending America. Our people stood united on a program of defense. Congress passed appropriation after appropriation for guns and planes and battleships, with the approval of the overwhelming majority of our citizens. That a large portion of these appropriations was to be used to build arms for Europe, we did not learn until later. That was another step.

      To use a specific example; in 1939, we were told that we should increase our air corps to a total of 5,000 planes. Congress passed the necessary legislation. A few months later, the administration told us that the United States should have at least 50,000 planes for our national safety. But almost as fast as fighting planes were turned out from our factories, they were sent abroad, although our own air corps was in the utmost need of new equipment; so that today, two years after the start of war, the American army has a few hundred thoroughly modern bombers and fighters–less in fact, than Germany is able to produce in a single month.

      Ever since its inception, our arms program has been laid out for the purpose of carrying on the war in Europe, far more than for the purpose of building an adequate defense for America.

      Now at the same time we were being prepared for a foreign war, it was necessary, as I have said, to involve us in the war. This was accomplished under that now famous phrase “steps short of war.”

      England and France would win if the United States would only repeal its arms embargo and sell munitions for cash, we were told. And then [illegible] began, a refrain that marked every step we took toward war for many months–“the best way to defend America and keep out of war.” we were told, was “by aiding the Allies.”

      First, we agreed to sell arms to Europe; next, we agreed to loan arms to Europe; then we agreed to patrol the ocean for Europe; then we occupied a European island in the war zone. Now, we have reached the verge of war.

      The war groups have succeeded in the first two of their three major steps into war. The greatest armament program in our history is under way.

      We have become involved in the war from practically every standpoint except actual shooting. Only the creation of sufficient “incidents” yet remains; and you see the first of these already taking place, according to plan [ill.]– a plan that was never laid before the American people for their approval.

      Men and women of Iowa; only one thing holds this country from war today. That is the rising opposition of the American people. Our system of democracy and representative government is on test today as it has never been before. We are on the verge of a war in which the only victor would be chaos and prostration.

      We are on the verge of a war for which we are still unprepared, and for which no one has offered a feasible plan for victory–a war which cannot be won without sending our soldiers across the ocean to force a landing on a hostile coast against armies stronger than our own.

      We are on the verge of war, but it is not yet too late to stay out. It is not too late to show that no amount of money, or propaganda, or patronage can force a free and independent people into war against its will. It is not yet too late to retrieve and to maintain the independent American destiny that our forefathers established in this new world.

      The entire future rests upon our shoulders. It depends upon our action, our courage, and our intelligence. If you oppose our intervention in the war, now is the time to make your voice heard.

      Help us to organize these meetings; and write to your representatives in Washington. I tell you that the last stronghold of democracy and representative government in this country is in our house of representatives and our senate.

      There, we can still make our will known. And if we, the American people, do that, independence and freedom will continue to live among us, and there will be no foreign war.”

  5. paulvonharnish says:

    The effeminate issue can be traced to EM radiation as well. This is one study defining the results of government sponsored neutering. >

    Conclusion

    “In conclusion, we observed, among a sample over 26 000 men of reproductive age from the whole of France, partners of totally infertile women, a continuous decrease in semen concentration between 1989 and 2005, of about 1.9% per year. We argue that this sample is close to the general population and is by far the most important sample of men studied in France until now; and, to our knowledge, it is one of the largest studied samples in the world. We also observed in this sample a decrease in the percentage of sperm with morphologically normal sperm. These results indicate a severe and generalized decrease in semen quality in France, possibly since the 1970s, which constitutes a serious public health warning.”

    Complete study:

    http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/12/02/humrep.des415.full

    See Figure 4
    “Variation in percent for morphologically normal forms since 1 January 1989 for a 35-year-old man in metropolitan France with 95% confidence intervals (left axis). Projected values in percentage morphologically normal forms (right axis).”

    Note: In my opinion, if an overlay graph of digital pulsed cell phone usage and wi-fi proliferation were used, there would be a significant correlation found in the data.

    I’ve been looking for warriors. There are very few left. Warrior class individuals have been systematically eliminated from the gene pool for centuries. Dead warriors generally don’t get a chance to reproduce, and their women often get slaughtered as well. Every once and a while I come across pages like “Deep Green Resistance.” I get a little excited, then discover it’s just another fagot that wants to throw his cell phone at the nasty boogieman, or start a petition…

    I saw your phone number on a different page. Mind if I call?

    • absolutely, call anytime, I’ll meet you too!

    • you see that is the problem, if somebody will not talk to you on the phone or meet you in person than they are not serious, we must stick together and prepare, Feinstein is right now introducing legislation to make it illegal to criticize the nsa… vets are being disarmed… its time for armed protests, open carry is totally legal, lets get to the fucking showdown already

    • have you went to jbcampbellextremismonline.com
      He is a trustworthy guy and a great patriot, his ideology is my ideology – there is no substitute for violence, its time to elevate the working class to masters of the state, by any means

enlighten me

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s