126 STAT. 1146 PUBLIC LAW 112-150

126 STAT. 1146 PUBLIC LAW 112150JULY 27, 2012

Public Law 112150

112th Congress

An Act To enhance strategic cooperation between the United States and israel, and for

other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States-israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012’’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Since 1948, United States Presidents and both houses of Congress, on a bipartisan basis and supported by the American people, have repeatedly reaffirmed the special bond between the United States and israel, based on shared values and shared interests.

(2) The Middle East is undergoing rapid change, bringing with it hope for an expansion of democracy but also great challenges to the national security of the United States and our allies in the region, particularly to our most important ally in the region, israel.

(3) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is continuing its decades-long pattern of seeking to foment instability and promote extremism in the Middle East, particularly in this time of dramatic political transition.

(4) At the same time, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to enrich uranium in defiance of multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions.

(5) A nuclear-weapons capable Iran would fundamentally threaten vital United States interests, encourage regional nuclear proliferation, further empower Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, and pose a serious and destabilizing threat to Israel and the region.

(6) Over the past several years, with the assistance of the Governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria, Hizbollah and Hamas have increased their stockpile of rockets, with more than 60,000 now ready to be fired at Israel. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to add to its arsenal of ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, which threaten Iran’s neighbors, israel, and United States Armed Forces in the region.

(7) As a result, israel is facing a fundamentally altered strategic environment. USC 8601. note. United States- israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012. July 27, 2012

[S. 2165] PUBLIC LAW 112 150JULY 27, 2012 126 STAT. 1147

(8) Pursuant to chapter 5 of title 1 of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108 11; 117 Stat. 576), the authority to make available loan guarantees to Israel is currently set to expire on September 30, 2012.

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States:

(1) To reaffirm our unwavering commitment to the security of the State of israel as a jewish state. As President Barack Obama stated on December 16, 2011, ‘‘America’s commitment and my commitment to israel and israel’s security is unshakeable.’’ And as President George W. Bush stated before the israeli Knesset on May 15, 2008, on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel, ‘‘The alliance between our governments is unbreakable, yet the source of our friendship runs deeper than any treaty.’’.

(2) To help the Government of Israel preserve its qualitative military edge amid rapid and uncertain regional political transformation.

(3) To veto any one-sided anti-israel resolutions at the United Nations Security Council.

(4) To support israel’s inherent right to self-defense.

(5) To pursue avenues to expand cooperation with the Government of israel both in defense and across the spectrum of civilian sectors, including high technology, agriculture, medicine, health, pharmaceuticals, and energy.

(6) To assist the Government of israel with its ongoing efforts to forge a peaceful, negotiated settlement of the israeli- Palestinian conflict that results in two states living side-byside in peace and security, and to encourage Israel’s neighbors to recognize israel’s right to exist as a jewish state.

(7) To encourage further development of advanced technology programs between the United States and israel given current trends and instability in the region.

SEC. 4. UNITED STATES ACTIONS TO ASSIST IN THE DEFENSE OF

ISRAEL AND PROTECT UNITED STATES INTERESTS.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should take the following actions to assist in the defense of Israel:

(1) Seek to enhance the capabilities of the Governments of the United States and israel to address emerging common threats, increase security cooperation, and expand joint military exercises.

(2) Provide the Government of israel such support as may be necessary to increase development and production of joint missile defense systems, particularly such systems that defend against the urgent threat posed to israel and United States forces in the region.

(3) Provide the Government of israel assistance specifically for the production and procurement of the Iron Dome defense system for purposes of intercepting short-range missiles, rockets, and projectiles launched against israel.

(4) Provide the Government of israel defense articles and defense services through such mechanisms as appropriate, to include air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.

USC 8603.

USC 8602.

126 STAT. 1148 PUBLIC LAW 112150JULY 27, 2012

(5) Provide the Government of israel additional excess defense articles, as appropriate, in the wake of the withdrawal of United States forces from Iraq.

(6) Examine ways to strengthen existing and ongoing efforts, including the Gaza Counter Arms Smuggling Initiative, aimed at preventing weapons smuggling into Gaza pursuant to the 2009 agreement following the israeli withdrawal from Gaza, as well as measures to protect against weapons smuggling and terrorist threats from the Sinai Peninsula.

(7) Offer the Air Force of israel additional training and exercise opportunities in the United States to compensate for israel’s limited air space.

(8) Work to encourage an expanded role for israel with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), including an enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises.

(9) Expand already-close intelligence cooperation, including satellite intelligence, with israel.

SEC. 5. ADDITIONAL STEPS TO DEFEND iSRAEL AND PROTECT AMERICAN INTERESTS.

(a) EXTENSION OF WAR RESERVES STOCKPILE AUTHORITY.

(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2005.

Section 12001(d) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108

287; 118 Stat. 1011) is amended by striking ‘‘more than 8 years after’’ and inserting ‘‘more than 10 years after’’.

(2) FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. Section 514(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2011 and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2013 and 2014’’.

(b) EXTENSION OF LOAN GUARANTEES TO iSRAEL.

Chapter 5 of title I of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108 11; 117 Stat. 576) is amended under= the heading ‘‘LOAN GUARANTEES TO iSRAEL’’

(1) in the matter preceding the first proviso, by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’; and

(2) in the second proviso, by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’.

SEC. 6. REPORTS REQUIRED.

(a) REPORT ON iSRAEL’S QUALITATIVE MILITARY EDGE (QME).

(1) IN GENERAL.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the status of Israel’s qualitative military edge in light of current trends and instability in the region.

(2) SUBSTITUTION FOR QUADRENNIAL REPORT.

If submitted within one year of the date that the first quadrennial report

required by section 201(c)(2) of the Naval Vessel Transfer Act of 2008 (Public Law 110429; 22 U.S.C. 2776 note) is due to be submitted, the report required by paragraph (1) may substitute for such quadrennial report.

(b) REPORTS ON OTHER MATTERS.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on each of the following matters: President.

USC 8604.

PUBLIC LAW 112 150JULY 27, 2012 126 STAT. 1149

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY S. 2165 (H.R. 4133): SENATE REPORTS: No. 112 179 (Comm. on Foreign Relations).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

July 17, considered and passed House.

DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2012):

July 27, Presidential remarks.

Æ

(1) Taking into account the Government of Israel’s urgent requirement for F 35 aircraft, actions to improve the process relating to its purchase of F 35 aircraft, particularly with respect to cost efficiency and timely delivery.

(2) Efforts to expand cooperation between the United States and israel in homeland security, counter-terrorism, maritime security, energy, cyber-security, and other related areas.

(3) Actions to integrate israel into the defense of the Eastern Mediterranean.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.

The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means

(A) the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) QUALITATIVE MILITARY EDGE.

The term ‘‘qualitative military edge’’ has the meaning given the term in section 36(h)(2) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(h)(2)). Approved July 27, 2012.USC 8605.

My comments:

That is public law 112-150, a disgusting piece of evidence that proves every politician is guilty of high treason, all politicians are in support of this filth and not one has stood up to denounce it as far as I know. This is the 2012 US israel enhanced security cooperation act, except it has now been passed into public law. Public law 112-150, so what kind of things are included in this “public law?”

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States:

(3) To veto any one-sided anti-Israel resolutions at the

United Nations Security Council.

My Comments:

That is a very strange thing to be passed into public law isn’t it? To say it is the policy of the United States to veto any anti israeli resolutions at the UN security council? The euphemism of “one sided” is meaningless and is an attempt to circumvent anything israel doesn’t like by saying “oh that’s one sided” It now becomes impossible for anyone to try and make the claim that israeli and jewish interests are not guiding the political system of this nation, the United States, to the detriment of all of its citizens. I would like to add that this year’s 2013 israeli worship act also called S. B. 462 gives israel visa waiver status although they continue not to meet the requirements… we will deal with that in a separate article…

Section. 2. Findings

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Since 1948, United States Presidents and both houses

of Congress, on a bipartisan basis and supported by the American

people, have repeatedly reaffirmed the special bond

between the United States and Israel, based on shared values

and shared interests

My Comments:

First of all, lets not forget that since 1913 FOR SURE almost all politicians (excepting notable men of truth like Charles August Lindbergh, Louis Thomas McFadden, James Vincent Forrestal,B Carroll Reece, Norman Dodd, J William Fulbright and Paul Findley are just a few) have been in the pocket of international finance capital. As evidenced by president Wilson’s passing of the Federal Reserve Act. Charles August Lindbergh warned us that this would be “a private bank loaning you your own money at interest!” Also, the modern state of israel was basically financed by the Rot Schild (red shield money lenders) family now calling themselves the Rothschilds or De Rothschilds… what a joke when their real name is bauer… So the above paragraph must be taken in the context of traitor politicians who have a financial incentive to lie to and to betray the working class citizens of this nation. That is what “special bond” means, special bond – we own you through bribery/corruption and have compromised information on each of you regarding pedophelia and prostitution in conjunction with united nations and dyncorp type child trafficking rings which are allowed to engage in sadistic crimes against the nation with no recourse to public outrage. It isnt enought that politicians have a financial incentive to betray the people but they are also compromised as continuously comes to light.

Also, let us not forget that in fact a lot of politicians were absolutely opposed to the founding of the apartheid state of israel and also the founding of the CIA which many people considered at the time to be an extension of the israeli mossad secret intelligence… I shall list a few US politicians who opposed the killing of our European brothers through fradulent world wars in order to further the enormous power of international finance capital. Also, those who opposed the founding of israel or the enormous power of the israeli lobby within this country’s worthless constitutional based excuse of a political system.

On the fradulent world wars that were really one big war against a cultured nation, recognize that zionism was began in the late 1800’s so that already during ww1 there were attempts to fabricate anti jewish pogroms such as those decribed by several american miltary intelligence figures in Eastern Europe, we have confirmation that the bolshevik phenomenom was entirely jewish led according to:

General George Veazy Strong

Colonel Truman Smith

Colonel William A McCain

Colonel Gordon A Johnson

These men described the tactic of jews using anti bolshevik nationalist ideologies as excuses to call the nationalists anti semites and to manufacture anti semitism in general. By the way, semitism means favoritism to jews so anti semitism merely means “I don’t wish to show favoritism to jews” or anyone else for that matter. These military intelligence men and the American military in general were already recognizing that Europe and Europeans (including Americans) were beginning to be subject to what they called a “jewish agenda.”

This information can be found in several areas such as freedom of information requests on ww1 correspondence between the above listed army intelligence officers as well as such works like “jewish threat” by Joseph W Bendersky who provides useful documents and information while trying to paint yet another picture of evil racist white people manufacturing the colorful “antisemetic” (i don’t want to show favoritism to jews) fantasy…

We also have an American diplomat in direct conflict with Felix Frankfurter and Louis Brandeis over the fact that he was exposing the fraud of anti semitism.

Hugh Gibson

A young diplomat who in 1919 was nominated to be US ambassador to Poland. Gibson who was highly regarded and considered particularly brilliant, began to report that there were far fewer anti semetic (non favoritism to jews) incidents than Americans were led to believe. He wrote his mother. “These yarns are exclusively of foreign manufacture for anti-polish purposes.” His letters came to the attention of Brandeis and his protege (and future supreme court justice) Felix Frankfurter, who demanded a meeting with gibson. Gibson later wrote of their accusations:

“I had (Brandeis and Frankfurter claimed) done more mischief to the jewish race than anyone who had lived in the last century. They said that my reports on the jewish question (problem) had gone around the world and had undone their work… They finally said that I had stated that the stories of excesses against the jews were exaggerated, to which i replied that they certainly were and i should think any jew would be glad to know it.”

Frankfurter hinted that if Gibson continued these reports, Zionists (jewish traitors of the nation) would block his confirmation by the senate.

Gibson was outraged and sent a 21-page letter to the state department. In it he shared his suspicions that this was part of “a conscienceless and cold blooded plan to make the condition of the jews in Poland so bad that they must turn to zionism for relief.”

In 1923 another American diplomat in Poland, Vice Consul Monroe Kline, echoed Gibson’s analysis: “It is common knowledge that “zionists” (jews) are continually and constantly spreading propaganda, through their agencies over the entire world, of political and religious persecution.

This information can be easily found in the book

Hugh Gibson and a controversy over Polish-jewish relations after ww1: a documentary history

by Andrzej Kapiszewski, which many people will find impossible to locate.

Charles August Lindbergh and Louis Thomas Mcfadden

relentlessly opposed both the institution of the traitorous federal reserve act and the pure sham that was ww1. Also we have Charles Lindbergh the son, who was a great American patriot and America Firster during the ww2 era.

“The financial system has been turned over to the federal reserve board. That board administers the financial system  by the authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possibe profits from the use of other peoples money”

Charles August Lindbergh

Notice the similarity to this one sided pro israel legislation passed into law by politicians completely under the control of international finance from the israeli/jewish lobby. If Lindbergh were here now to view the disaster America has become I feel he would say that the entire government has become just as bad or worse than the foes he faced in his long patriotic career…

“We have in this country one of the most corrupt insitutions the world has ever known, I refer to the federal reserve board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the united states and has practicaly bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the money vultures who control it”

Louis Thomas McFadden

Again, notice the similarity of these statements on the private federal reserve bank, to the control of our entire political system today by the israeli/jewish lobby. I say jewish because jews never sincerely oppose or critisize the actions of their brethren… They have collective guilt that they can not wipe clean except by leaving the nations and reliquishing ownership of any and all assets of the working class of the nations. They know this must happen and their refusal to allow the working class their rightful freedom from economic and financial enslavement is entirely their own creation.

Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the intenational jewish/israeli lobby that has gained complete control of our entire political process, not to mention also the media and banking/economics. It operates entirely outside of the control of any national institution and yet it controls our national institutions so completely that this public law 112-150 can be enacted with a clause stating “It is the policy of the United States to veto any one sided anti-israeli resolutions at the united nations security coucil.” So the elected politicians(supposedly) of the American people are loyal to the israeli lobby and their jewish traitors placed strategicaly here in the american financial system? These politicians are obviously not loyal to the american people, thats our fault by the way, we have not made it in their best interest to not betray us. The united nations now makes our national decisions for us, based on the decisions and interests of the jewish/israeli lobbies!

We are in danger and the ballot box isnt going to change anything, what did John Fitzgerald Kennedy say when all peaceful avenues have been exhausted?

James Vincent Forrestal

opposes the founding of the state of israel and the cia, a great article I have shamelessly pillaged.

The significance of James Vincent Forrestal can be summarised in two short statements. He was the man with executive responsibility in the Truman Administration who dared to say that the best interests of America and the free world dictated that Zionism should not be allowed to determine US policy in the Middle East.

If there was one man above all others most likely to succeed in getting the Palestine problem lifted out of American domestic politics that one man was Forrestal.

As a leading and very successful banker he understood that the US would have to generate the wealth to fund the Marshall Plan for the reconstruction of war-devastated Western Europe and that, in order to put capitalism back on its feet in Western Europe and Britain, an uninterrupted and escalating flow of Arab oil at the cheapest possible price was the most crucial factor and that Oil was the main source of Forrestal’s interest as Secretary of Defence, and how the Palestine problem should be handled by the administration he served.

Forrestal regarded the creation of a Jewish state in the face of Arab and wider Muslim opposition as a threat to the US national interest and, in the even bigger picture, America’s ability to fulfil its global obligations.

That Forrestal’s strategic view was shared by Marshall, the other leading American at the time with unquestionable integrity made it all the more remarkable that, when the crunch came, President Truman chose to surrender to the Jews with the consequences that still exist.

At a cabinet meeting on the 7th November, three weeks before the vote in the General Assembly on the partition plan, Marshall presented the State Department’s review of the international situation. After the Cabinet Meeting Forrestal made the following note : “I repeated my suggestion made several times previously that a serious attempt be made to lift the Palestine problem out of American partisan politics. No group in this country should be permitted to influence our policy to the point where it could endanger our national security.”

The day before he had an unsatisfactory meeting with Senator Mcgragh, National Chairman of the Democratic Party, and depressed by his initial response, they nevertheless had lunch together three days later. Forrestal produced a secret report on Palestine prepared by the CIA and he read part of it to the Senator. But McGragh had a secret of his own to reveal: the fact that Jewish sources were responsible for a substantial part of the contributions to the National Committee of the Democratic party. Many of the contributions were made with the distinct idea of the givers that they would have the opportunity to express their views and have them seriously considered on such questions as the present Palestine question. Added to which there was a feeling amongst the Jews that the United States was not doing what it should to solicit votes in the General Assembly in favour of the partition of Palestine. Beyond this the Jews expected the United States to do its utmost to implement the Partition decision when it was voted on by the UN, through force if necessary.

Forrestal stuck to his guns and stressed that it involved not merely the Arabs of the Middle East but also might involve the whole Muslim world.

Later in his diary Forrestal noted: “I had lunch with B. M. Baruch.”

Bernard Mannes Baruch,

constituted the real power, economic, political and military. Forrestal’s brief but tantalising diary note of the conversation said : “He took the line of advising me not to be active in this particular matter. That I was already identified and it was agreed that opposition to the United Nations’ policy on Palestine was not in my own interest. He said that the Democratic Party could only lose by trying to get our Government’s policy reversed.”

Baruch knew of course that his statement was untrue. Partition was not UN policy. only the jews were asserting that Partition was already UN policy. It was, as Forrestal had pointed out, only a rigged recommendation of the General Assembly.

The truth was Forrestal was being subjected to the maximum possible pressure by civilised means.

One of the greatest and most tragic ironies in the whole story of the creation of the Arab/Israeli conflict is that on the same day, 3rd February 1948, Forrestal received word that the Republican Party was ready to have negotiations with the Democratic party about taking the Palestine problem out of US politics.

And yet within a matter of days the prospect of negotiations to lift the Palestine problem out of US domestic policy was killed.

Baruch’s role was a critical one. He was telling (warning?) Forrestal that it was not in his own interests to pursue the matter of taking Palestine out of US domestic politics. By this he could have meant: (1) that the Jews had enough influence in Congress to deny him the legislative and fiscal support he needed to make a success of the new department of Defence or (2) that the Jews had enough influence with the Democratic Party to have Forrestal removed from office.

The bottom line of Baruch’s advice to Forrestal could not have been clearer. The election prospects of the Democratic Party had to be given priority and that meant abandoning the campaign to get Palestine out of US domestic politics.

It followed that, if Forrestal could be neutralised, the campaign to take the Palestine problem out of US domestic politics would be terminated.

Forrestal sent a transcript of his conversation with Winthrop Aldrich, the president of the Chase National Bank in New York, to Marshall regarding the possibility of negotiations with the Republican Party to take the Palestine problem out of US politics. That done Forrestal drew up a memorandum for President Truman. The edited version of the “Forrestal Diaries” as published does not reveal what this particular Forrestal memorandum said and it appears it was never submitted to the President.

A sensational development three weeks later would have removed from Forrestal’s mind any lingering doubt that some in the Democratic Party would stop at nothing to stop the loss of Jewish campaign funds and votes.

On the morning of the 26th March Marshall called Forrestal with disturbing news that the Democratic Party would have to draft General Eisenhower as its nominee.

Eisenhower came from a poor family of Jewish origin and had not much of academic achievement until he entered the United States Military Academy at West Point. When America entered the war he was only a colonel. But by the time Germany surrendered on the 7th May 1945, he was a five-star general, having been promoted over the heads of 30 more experienced officers.

His rapid promotion had arisen because Marshall and Baruch had recognised his abilities.

When Eisenhower allowed himself to be persuaded to run for the Presidency in 1952, it was on the Republican and not the Democratic ticket.

It is not difficult to believe that Eisenhower was disturbed by the complicity of the Democratic party in the destruction of Forrestal.

Forrestal’s diary entry for the 31st December a week after Israel broke the cease fire and launched its offensive to destroy the Egyptian army in the Negev he had learned of an unexpected request by the State Department for 6,000 American troops to be used as a “guard force” in Jerusalem apparently to assist the implementation of Bernadotte’s Peace Plan. With some bitterness Forrestal said that it was another example of the disconnection in policy making.

He also repeated his long held view that America’s Palestine policy had been made for “squalid political purposes.” He concluded by saying that he hoped one day to be able to make his position clear on that issue. The implication is that, if Forrestal had lived, he would have written an insider’s book of the corruption of America’s foreign policy, and the need to clean it up so that those with executive responsibility for protecting US interests and security were to be allowed to do their jobs to the best of their professional ability.

Forrestal resigned on March 28th 1949. In 1949 there were rumours that he had a mental breakdown. Forrestal himself maintained that he was being tracked and bugged by Israeli security agents. It was later learned that Jewish agents feared that America was making secret arrangements with Arab agents and had followed around another Government official with similar views on Israel as Forrestal.

He had also been the victim of a slander campaign against him led by the columnist Drew Pearson. The campaign tried to make it appear he was paranoid although paranoia has never been mentioned in the official evaluations of his state.

He had checked into the Bethesba Naval Hospital five days after his resignation. His condition was officially announced to be physical and nervous exhaustion. Forrestal seemed to be on the road to recovery when in the early morning of May 22nd his body was found on a third floor roof below the 16th floor kitchen across the hall from his room.

The County Coroner called it a suicide within hours of death.The official Naval Review Board which completed hearings on May 31st did not release a brief summary of its findings until October 12th. The announcement stated only that Forrestal had died from a fall from the window. It did not say what might have caused the fall nor did it make any mention of the bathrobe sash that was tied round his neck. There were reports of paranoia and of involuntary commitment to the hospital as well as suspicions about the details of the circumstances of his death, which have fed a variety of conspiracy theories.

Additional doubts have been raised by the 2004 release of the Navy investigation. Among the discrepancies between the Report and the accounts given in the principal Forrestal biographies are that broken glass was found on Forrestal’s bed.

One of the nurses, in 1975, when she was then dying of terminal cancer, told a journalist that the day of the suicide as she was working in the hospital she had seen two men enter his room. There was an animated discussion and following that silence. The two men left and some minutes later his body was found after he had, presumably, jumped out of the window.

jewish Capitalism and James Forrestal

http://www.paragoy.com/forrestal.html

My comments:

Although the communists might well have had many infiltrators in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, no one has ever suggested that they dominate America’s news media. It is the news media that has vigorously sold the story that James Forrestal committed suicide and has kept silent about the fact that the only serious government investigation of the death has been kept secret from the American public. The news media also heavily publicized the books by Rogow and Hoopes and Brinkley, which sell the suicide line, but they published not one single review of the critical book by Cornell Simpson.

B Caroll Reece and Norman Dodd

I’m not trying to make this article too long to read so I will simply state that the efforts of these 2 courageous men in regard to investigating the tax exempt foundations and basically uncovering the fact that emanting from the white house was the directive to alter the social fabric of the united states through education until it could be comfortably merged with the soviet union is of extreme importance. Why? well, because of the fact that the bolshevik revolution along with the Bolsheviks themselves were funded, trained and sent from New York. jewish groups under poeple like Bernard Baruch and Felix Frankfurter sent Brontstein aka Trotsky to Russia to set up the most horrendous act of mass murder of European peoples ever witnessed in history. All at the hands of an ethnicaly yiddish jewish group of communist murderers. For anyone still in denial of the jewish identity of Mordecai Levi(Karl Marx), Nikolai Blank(Vladimir Lenin), Lev Bronstein(Leon Trotsky) or any of the other unpunished mass murderers of jewish ethnicity just read Nobel Prize winning author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 200 Years Together the jews in the Soviet Union. If you cant find it in english, mysteriously its never been published in english, than I am working on translating it to english, but it will be a while before I even start on it. Anyway, the close connection of communism and jews makes any anti-communist American politicians extremely important. If you can locate the Dodd Report on the tax exempt foundations you will find it extremely interesting to say the least.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

There is so much information available on jfk’s war against the corrupt jewish/israeli lobbies, the state of israel, the cia and debt based currency that its exhausting. The main acheivements of JFK should be noted:

The printing of a debt free vs. debt based currency, the united states notes, this simple act alone could free up so much capital devoted to fradulent interest charges etc… The nation went entirely bankrupt in 20 years from the institution of the Federal Reserve Act December 23 1913(passed during christmas break) to the Emergency Banking Act march 9th 1933.

The attempt to force the jewish lobby to register as a foreign institution and to halt their manipulation of the American political system, if kennedy could have instituted his plan on revising campaign contributing would we even be debating this ridculous law 112-150?

The demand of Kennedy that israel cease and desist trying to build nuclear weapons, such as the dimona nuclear site, which they arrogantly claimed was not a nuclear facility and finaly that it was for “peaceful” research…

The commitment to stay out of vietnam, stop the war developing there and stop filling the pockets of the money lenders and war profiteers by allowing them to use the US military for sisister purposes.

Now John Kennedy is too extensive to go into in this article but i would refer people to an article I already posted entitled “united states notes” on kennedy’s stand against international finance capital.

On the concern of allowing the jewish lobby to continue in this country, we find that in the book They Dared to Speak Out People and institutions confront israel’s lobby by Paul Findley on page 114:

Kennedy was very insulted when one of the jews said that they knew Kennedy’s campaign was in financial diffiulty and that he and his jewish friends would “help and help significantly” Kennedy’s campaign if, once he became president, Kennedy “would allow them to set the course of Middle East policy over the next four years.”

In response to such arrogance by the enemies of free nations Kennedy’s plan was to institute a clean up of the corrupted political campaign contributing machine here in the US. His idea was as follows:

A law that would have the US treasury pay a set and equal amount for all politicians running for president who secured a to be determined percentage of signature’s of people supporting their campaign. Kennedy genuinely wanted to cut the knees out from under the current campaign finance methods because it made politicians so reliant upon the huge cash inlays of special-interest groups. Regrettably, Kennedy did not have the time to implement this program, and to this day our political system is still monopolized by lobbyists from the very same special-interest groups.

This would be one of the only ways to prevent the nightmare of today, presidents and congressional representatives being financialy corrupted by the jewish lobby and Israeli lobby. I am here making the distinction that there is in fact several lobbies of the jews here in the US and also of the foreign jews of israel, some of whom possess dual citizenship. Another way to solve the issue would simply be to deport all of these jews from the country for political subversion and also moral subversion, not to mention economic servitude. The close loyalty of jews to one another should suffice to consider them a giant subversive political group that must be collectively dealt with.

On the demand that Kennedy made to israel to cease and desist attempting to acquire nuclear capabilities, one must simply look into the correspondence between Kennedy and Ben-Gurion if that’s even his real name? There was a clear struggle to the death between them and i think that there is evidence to show that even today israel still thinks they can take out anyone as evidenced by the Atlanta jewish times article on Obama from January 13th 2012.

I would advise anyone interested in the strange dimona nuclear facility battle between kennedy and David Ben-Gurion to read Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper. Final judgement is, I think, the most accurate book on who killed John F Kennedy.

On the battle between the Kennedy’s and the CIA I would suggest reading JFK the CIA, Vietnam and the plot to assassinate John F Kennedy by Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty.

There remains yet more politicians opposed to israel and the jewish and israeli lobbies in general

U.S. Officials Oppose Creation of Israel

The U.S. State Department opposed this partition plan strenuously, considering Zionism contrary to both fundamental American principles and U.S. interests.

For example, the director of the State Department’s Office of Near Eastern and African Affairs consistently recommended against supporting a Jewish state in Palestine. The director, named Loy Henderson, warned that the creation of such a state would go against locals’ wishes, imperil U.S. interests and violate democratic principles.

Henderson emphasized that the U.S. would lose moral standing in the world if it supported Zionism:

“At the present time the United States has a moral prestige in the Near and Middle East unequaled by that of any other great power. We would lose that prestige and would be likely for many years to be considered as a betrayer of the high principles which we ourselves have enunciated during the period of the [second world] war.”

When Zionists began pushing the partition plan in the UN, Henderson recommended strongly against supporting their proposal, saying that such a partition would have to be implemented by force and was “not based on any principle.” He warned that partition “would guarantee that the Palestine problem would be permanent and still more complicated in the future…”

Henderson elaborated further on how plans to partition Palestine would violate American and UN principles:

“…[Proposals for partition] are in definite contravention to various principles laid down in the [UN] Charter as well as to principles on which American concepts of Government are based. These proposals, for instance, ignore such principles as self-determination and majority rule. They recognize the principle of a theocratic racial state and even go so far in several instances as to discriminate on grounds of religion and race…”

Zionists attacked Henderson virulently, calling him “anti-Semitic,” demanding his resignation, and threatening his family. They pressured the State Department to transfer him elsewhere; one analyst describes this as “the historic game of musical chairs” in which officials who recommended Middle East policies “consistent with the nation’s interests” were moved on.

In 1948 Truman sent Henderson to the slopes of the Himalayas, as Ambassador to Nepal (then officially under India). (In recent years, at times virtually every State Department country desk has been directed by a Zionist.)

But Henderson was far from alone in making his recommendations. He wrote that his views were not only those of the entire Near East Division but were shared by “nearly every member of the Foreign Service or of the [State] Department who has worked to any appreciable extent on Near Eastern problems.”

He wasn’t exaggerating. Official after official and agency after agency opposed Zionism.

In 1947 the CIA reported that Zionist leadership was pursuing objectives that would endanger both Jews and “the strategic interests of the Western powers in the Near and Middle East.”

Ambassador Henry F. Grady, who has been called “America’s top diplomatic soldier for a critical period of the Cold War,” headed a 1946 commission aimed at coming up with a solution for Palestine. Grady later wrote about the Zionist lobby and its damaging effect on U.S.

Worth mentioning is also another politician J William Fulbright, i will repost a short article I found insightful.

Sen. Fulbright: “israel controls the US senate” by William Randolph Chesterfield

On April 15, 1973, while a guest on the CBS televison program Face The Nation, Senator Fulbright said, “Israel controls the United States Senate.”This comment could be dismissed as an overstatement; yet it is collaborated with a other comments, one of the most poignant of which was made by an Israeli newspaper:”The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim (Gentiles), but an administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law connected with the term ‘government of goyim’ should be re-examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S.” Bar-Yosef, Avinoan. (1994) The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court. Maariv, September 2.Comments by U. S. Congressman Paul Findley
“Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel’s U.S. lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive uncritical support to Israel.
“Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel’s U.S. lobby, open discussion of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our government all these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years, and to this day maintain a close watch on Congress.
“For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill, criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke out Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul “Pete” McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself were defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel forces.
“As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily biased in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally lop-sided in Israel’s favor, remain largely unaware that Congress behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.
“The lobby’s intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every government center, and even houses of worship and revered institutions of higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many U.S. Jews who object to the lobby’s tactics and Israel’s brutality.”
Comments By U. S. Senator Ernest F. Hollings – Wednesday 23 June 2004
“In 1996, a task force was formed in Jerusalem including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser. They submitted a plan for Israel to incoming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Clean Break. It proposed that negotiations with the Palestinians be cut off and, instead, the Mideast be made friendly to Israel by democratizing it. First Lebanon would be bombed, then Syria invaded on the pretext of weapons of mass destruction. Afterward, Saddam Hussein was to be removed in Iraq and replaced with a Hashemite ruler favorable to Israel.
“The plan was rejected by Netanyahu, so Perle started working for a similar approach to the Mideast for the United States. Taking on the support of Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Cambone, Scooter Libby, Donald Rumsfeld et al., he enlisted the support of the Project for the New American Century.
“The plan hit paydirt with the election of George W. Bush. Perle took on the Defense Policy Board. Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith became one, two and three at the Defense Department, and Cheney as vice president took Scooter Libby and David Wurmser as his deputies. Clean Break was streamlined to go directly into Iraq. Iraq, as a threat to the United States, was all contrived.”

My Comments:

So, I think its safe to say that in fact most honest politicians we have had were not in favor of the state of israel and share absolutely no values or interests with israel and jews in general except perhaps traitor politicians forcing us to pay interest to international finance capital.

Now moving on to few more relevant sections of this most disgusting of documents, just reading most of this putrid law should suffice to incense American anger into action!

Section. 2. Findings

Congress makes the following findings:

(3) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is continuing its decades-long pattern of seeking to foment instability and promote extremism in the Middle East, particularly in this time of dramatic political transition.

(4) At the same time, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to enrich uranium in defiance of multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions.

(5) A nuclear-weapons capable Iran would fundamentally threaten vital United States interests, encourage regional nuclear proliferation, further empower Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, and pose a serious and destabilizing threat to israel and the region.

My Comments:

Iran has a decades long pattern of seeking to foment instability and promoting extremism? Is this a joke? Is the mossad based in Iran or did I miss something? Where is any evidence to support any of these fantastic claims?

Paragraph 4 the “enriching uranium bs” didn’t we here that in Iraq followed by the report showing their last attempts at attempting to obtain uranium being over a decade old?

Paragraph 5 a nuclear capable Iran, I find this the most amusing as Iran has signed the Nuclear non-proliferation treaty that israel has not and never will sign. Iran has never been shown to be attempting to procure nuclear weapons. There has been nothing in the way of evidence to show Iran is doing anything other than not being under the International Monetary Fund. Meanwhile israel a non native to palestine group of Birobidzhan natives from south Russia,  Birobidzhan established by Josef Dzhugasvilli aka Stalin as the first jewish homeland in 1934, is condoning genocide against the ethnic palestinians much as they did against ethnic Russians, Ukranians and all Eastern Europeans before during and after world war 2 with the blessing of the US and UK false governments!

On paragraph 5 a nuclear capable Iran… world’s leading state sponsor of terror… Is this a joke? israel by far takes the cake as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, israel violates UN human right’s sanctions 24 hours a day but yet the UN does nothing… In Hungary the Jobbik Party has recently stated that israeli citizens should be required to register as national security threats due to the continuous human rights violations of the Palestinians. I agree! That would have stopped the 911 attacks from even happening!

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States:

(2) To help the Government of israel preserve its qualitative military edge amid rapid and uncertain regional political transformation.

(3) To veto any one-sided anti-Israel resolutions at the United Nations Security Council.

(4) To support Israel’s inherent right to self-defense.

(5) To pursue avenues to expand cooperation with the Government of israel both in defense and across the spectrum of civilian sectors, including high technology, agriculture, medicine, health, pharmaceuticals, and energy.

(6) To assist the Government of Israel with its ongoing efforts to forge a peaceful, negotiated settlement of the israeli- Palestinian conflict that results in two states living side-byside in peace and security, and to encourage israel’s neighbors to recognize israel’s right to exist as a jewish state.

(7) To encourage further development of advanced technology programs between the United States and israel given current trends and instability in the region.

My comments:

Paragraph 2 helping israel maintain “military edge” remember that your tax dollars are paying for every bit of it while you are also under economic servitude also instituted by them. Also remember that supporting israel is supporting the genocide of the people of several countries, look at what happened to Palestinians, Syrians, the people of Iraq… How many people will you help israel murder by funding and arming these bolsheviks from outh Russia who have a tremendous body count in murdering people this century? How much of your tax dollars funded the horrible gulag death camps in Russia during the bolshevik revolution and up until the 1950’s? The same people that did this are passing these laws and killing massive amounts of people in the middle east today.

Paragraph 3 the veto of any one sided anti-israeli resolutons at the united nations security council, isn’t that quite ridiculous? I mean how can you  even pass such a thing into LAW without the entire congress and representatives basically saying they are israel firster’s and complete traitors!

Paragraph 4 supporting israel’s right to self defense I would say that means supporting israel’s right to murder anyone and everyone.

Paragraph’s 5 and 7 appear to be a nice way of saying that israel should have control of US military technology and perhaps even of the US military, which they seem to have already.

Paragraph 6 is simply a joke to even suggest using the words israel and peaceful in the same sentence.

SEC. 4. UNITED STATES ACTIONS TO ASSIST IN THE DEFENSE OF iSRAEL AND PROTECT UNITED STATES INTERESTS.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should take the following actions to assist in the defense of israel:

(1) Seek to enhance the capabilities of the Governments of the United States and israel to address emerging common threats, increase security cooperation, and expand joint military exercises.

(2) Provide the Government of israel such support as may be necessary to increase development and production of joint missile defense systems, particularly such systems that defend against the urgent threat posed to Israel and United States forces in the region.

(3) Provide the Government of israel assistance specifically for the production and procurement of the Iron Dome defense system for purposes of intercepting short-range missiles, rockets, and projectiles launched against Israel.

(4) Provide the Government of israel defense articles and defense services through such mechanisms as appropriate, to include air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.

USC 8603.

USC 8602.

My comments:

Paragraph 1 is simply dangerous, to suggest integrating israel into US security is suicide. Have we forgotten that this country deliberately attacked the USS Liberty in 1967 and continues to deny it and also has never been brought to justice for it? There is incontrovertible evidence that it was deliberate and they have gotten away with it.

Paragraph’s 2, 3 and 4 they key word is provide israel… When are we going to provide Americans with what they deserve? When shall the working class citizen at least be provided with living wages and social justice? How much money can we give israel? Has anyone ever divided the sum of money we give israel a year by their population to get an idea of how much money we are giving them on an individual basis for absolutely no reason? I am willing to bet it is per person more than some of our lower level working class citizen’s who deserve a lot better from out traitor politicians and economic/business leaders… The fact that we will not even take care of our less fortunate citizens but can arm israel to murder people is appalling to say the least.

SEC. 5. ADDITIONAL STEPS TO DEFEND iSRAEL AND PROTECT AMERICAN INTERESTS.

(a) EXTENSION OF WAR RESERVES STOCKPILE AUTHORITY.

(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2005.

Section 12001(d) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108287; 118 Stat. 1011) is amended by striking ‘‘more than 8 years after’’ and inserting ‘‘more than 10 years after’’.

(2) FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. Section 514(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2011 and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2013 and 2014’’.

(b) EXTENSION OF LOAN GUARANTEES TO iSRAEL.

Chapter 5

of title I of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108 11; 117 Stat. 576) is amended under the heading ‘‘LOAN GUARANTEES TO iSRAEL’’

(1) in the matter preceding the first proviso, by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’; and

(2) in the second proviso, by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’.

My comments:

Appropriations, Foreign Assistance and Extension of Loan gaurantee’s… How much money can we give the state of israel? I would assume as long as there is one penny left in the US israel will be asking for more aid and assistance. Why not threaten israel with peace, tell jews they have to perform manual labor for the second time this century and stop all the military aid etc… Enforce peace and make israeli’s get jobs. No more war profiteering and all their other vile cultural norms of a parasitic nature, how about the forcing of israel to become productive and self sufficient rather than parasitic?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

enlighten me

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s